Hunting News

New Evidence Suggests Humans Hunted for Meat 1.6 Million Years Earlier Than Previously Thought

Skull of Homo habilis on display at the Smithsonian Natural History Museum

Skull of Homo habilis on display at the Smithsonian Natural History Museum

Up until recently, it was widely believed that humans hunted for meat up to 400,000 years ago. A new discovery by anthropology professor Henry T. Bunn at the University of Wisconsin pushes back that assertion another 1.6 million years. This means that our human ancestors, Homo habilis (a diminutive and small-brained ape-like species), may have been selectively hunting adult animals in their prime two million years ago.

While it was commonly accepted that humans have been eating meat for millennia, scientists believed they ate the scraps of kills left by other predators or scavenged from animals that died of natural causes, as referenced in The Guardian and The Observer.

Bunn spoke at an annual meeting of the European Society for the Study of Human Evolution (ESHE) in Bordeaux to present his findings. The first evidence of hunted meat appeared at a site in Germany where evidence existed of horses being speared and eaten some 400,000 years ago.

“We know that humans ate meat two million years ago,” Bunn said. “What was not clear was the source of that meat. However, we have compared the type of prey killed by lions and leopards today with the type of prey selected by humans in those days. This has shown that men and women could not have been taking kill from other animals or eating those that had died of natural causes. They were selecting and killing what they wanted.”

Bunn determined this was the case by studying a huge, ancient butchery site in the Olduvai Gorge in Tanzania. About 1.8 million years ago, human ancestors brought wildebeests, antelopes and gazelles there to strip the meat from the bones to eat. They determined the age of the animal carcasses by studying the teeth in their skulls. It was found humans were butchering adult large antelope in their prime and older small antelope species. In contrast, lions and leopards preferred more elderly representatives of the large antelope species, and adults in their prime of the smaller antelope species.

“For all the animals we looked at, we found a completely different pattern of meat preference between ancient humans and other carnivores, indicating that we were not just scavenging from lions and leopards and taking their leftovers. We were picking what we wanted and were killing it ourselves,” Bunn said.

Speaking on speculation, Bunn predicted that these Homo habilis waited in trees until antelopes or gazelles passed by, then speared them at point-blank range – something to think about the next time you’re sitting in a tree stand with a handy bow or rifle!

Image from Ryan Somma on the flickr Creative Commons

Any views or opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect those of OutdoorHub. Comments on this article reflect the sole opinions of their writers.
  • http://www.facebook.com/oreillymike Mike OReilly

    Good piece, Angie, but there’s a lot of speculation, here. I haven’t read the study but I’ve read several books on the topic and just from the details you’ve presented, it seems like a real stretch to make such conclusion. We’ve truly learned a lot about humans and hominids by sifting through prehistoric garbage dumps but in this case we’re talking about a massive pit-full of bones millions of years old. It’s hard enough forensic work to determine if something was killed by a lion or a person, let alone draw conclusions about specific hunting situations. And let’s not forget, the human brain did not grow significantly in size and intelligence until we started using fire to cook our meat. Then our digestive tracts could actually do something useful with the amino acids and proteins present in raw meat. As Richard Wrangham states in his book “Catching Fire,” this is what led to the rapid increase in intelligence allowing us to make better tools, hunt more efficiently and use language more effectively, and finally say things like “Awe heck, I ain’t shootin’ that little six-pointer, I’m lettin’ him walk.” Given the fact that humans didn’t make fire until 800,000 years ago, I’m not sure we were smart enough to make decisions like that 2 million years ago. Maybe we were.

  • http://www.facebook.com/brent.besosa.5 Brent Robert Besosa

    More junk science … heck they even have big problem with Soft Tissue found in Dinosaur bones!
    http://www.icr.org/article/dinosaur-soft-tissue-finally-makes/

  • http://www.facebook.com/brent.besosa.5 Brent Robert Besosa

    More junk science is what this piece is … heck they even have big problem with Soft Tissue found in Dinosaur bones!
    http://www.icr.org/article/dinosaur-soft-tissue-finally-makes/