Opinion

The Seven Deadly Sins of Concealed Carry: Not Carrying

Piece be with you! But if it's at home, and not with you, it won't do you a whole lot of good.

Piece be with you! But if it's at home, and not with you, it won't do you a whole lot of good.

The fourth deadly sin of concealed carry is…not. Not carrying, that is.

Crazy has roamed the earth for about 65 million years—several decades before Joan Rivers’ first plastic surgery. Consider that we live in a world where  people proudly claim they are “Beliebers,” faux celebrities name their cute babies North West, and despotic Korean dictators have family members executed for missing a Black Friday Blu-Ray player sale. The scary part is that the current level of human crazy barely makes the nightly news.

So forgive me if I disagree when people tell me they aren’t carrying for reasons like this:

  • “I’m just running to the store.”
  • “I’ll only be out for a few minutes.”
  • “I won’t need my gun.”
  • “I won’t be in any bad areas.”

It’s an insanity-filled world out there and there is no such thing as a perfectly safe public outing. If you were really able to predict when and where you might be a victim of violent crime, why on earth would you ever be there in the first place, armed or not?

You never know what’s going to happen out there. A quick look at news stories will tell you exactly why you must carry all the time if you carry at all.

The big news is frequency. According to the FBI, a violent crime of some type occurs in the United States every 26 seconds. A murder occurs every 35.4 minutes, a forcible rape every 6.2 minutes, and a robbery every 1.5 minutes.

Zombies? Yeah, they’re the rage on TV and shooting accessory products, but I’m talking about the real kind. A Miami man permanently maimed another with just his teeth before being killed by a responding officer. A Texas man attacked friends and neighbors before eating the family dog. Admittedly, the odds of becoming the victim of a zombie attack are similar to Honey Boo Boo editing the Harvard Law Review. But it’s a classic example of the need to expect the unexpected.

The big news this winter is a series of “knockout game” reports. Apparently some folks’ idea of entertainment is to sneak up on distracted pedestrians and punch them in the head, trying to knock them unconscious from a single blow. Some game. Consider the fact that 678 people were murdered last year by beating with nothing but hands and feet. That’s over twice as many as killed by rifles of any kind.

Concealed carry isn’t only for protection against crime. You never know when you might need immediate access to a concealed weapon to protect yourself from irritable members of the animal kingdom. Dog attacks like this one suffered by 77-year-old Anthony Wilson are far too common. Other critters? How about a bobcat attack in Holden, Massachusetts? Heck, you might even cross paths with a shoplifting sea lion.

A New Orleans biker was rammed by a car while riding in a quiet residential neighborhood. After the aggressive bike bonk, the male driver and female accomplice robbed the downed cyclist at gunpoint. While carrying is not likely to help much against a Buick bludgeoning, our hapless cyclist might have appreciated the option of a concealed gun when on the ground facing armed robbers.

Home invasions? Here’s the gotcha. Home invasions are not a defined crime category in the FBI tracking statistics, so you have to estimate your own figure. At a high level, there are over 2 million burglaries per year in the United States annually. Roughly two-thirds of those are residential. The bottom line? People are breaking into houses, occupied and not, all the time. Concealed carry applies while at home too.

Violent crime happens everywhere, everyday. New York City officials made a big deal of publicizing November 26, 2012. Why? It was the only day anyone could remember without a reported murder, shooting, or stabbing. The fact that a day without violence is a notable event tells you all you need to know about the need to carry every day.

When people carry guns, criminals listen. Back in 1982, Kennesaw, Georgia passed a law requiring heads of households to keep at least one firearm in the home. Burglary rates dropped 89 percent and violent crime rates continue to be 85 percent lower than the national average. A potential lesson? When people expect armed opposition, they tend to behave. I know, concealed carry means that no one knows you’re carrying. But if the status quo becomes an assumption that permit holders carry everywhere, criminals will become somewhat more wary.

Be safe out there folks, it’s a crazy world. “Piece be with you” this holiday season!

Image by Tom McHale

Any views or opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect those of OutdoorHub. Comments on this article reflect the sole opinions of their writers.
  • Big Sarge

    Question, in the New Orleans attack, was the Mail Carrier robbing someone with an accomplice or was it simply a male suspect? Any way great story and suggestions about concealed carry and the reasons why.

    • http://mygunculture.com/ My Gun Culture

      Dang those dreaded typos! Especially the ones like mail and male that spell check won’t catch :-)

      • OutdoorHub.com Editor

        Oh boy, that one’s embarrassing to miss. Edited, thanks for bringing attention to it.

  • Westchester Gun Owner

    This is a sad way to go through life: “It’s an insanity-filled world out there and there is no such thing as a perfectly safe public outing.” If you think guns take away the insanity, I respectfully disagree with you.

    • http://mygunculture.com/ My Gun Culture

      Au contraire! I go through life with a spring in my step, smile on my face and corny joke forthcoming at any given time. Just ask anyone who knows me – they’re probably rolling their eyes already.

      But that doesn’t mean that I don’t recognize the reality that bad things happen. It’s not a sad way to go through life if you lock your doors, look around while walking through a dark parking lot or keep a fire extinguisher in the kitchen in case that Wok cooking experiment goes awry. That’s just sensible preparation.

      No one saying that guns magically remove insanity any more than a fire extinguisher removes fire from the face of the earth. But in the event that crime, or fire, does cross paths with you, a gun or fire extinguisher gives you a chance to manage the situation until help arrives.

      If some type of violent crime hasn’t yet touched at least the periphery of your life, chances are it will. Recognizing that is not going through life in a miserable state of fear and paranoia. Just the opposite. Acknowledging that things do happen, and making sensible preparations, gives you the freedom to enjoy life.

    • Ned Carbine

      You freaking idiot.

  • ross

    “678 people were murdered last year by beating with nothing but hands and feet. That’s over twice as many as killed by rifles of any kind.”

    This is a deliberately misleading statement. What you’re omitting is handguns, most of which do, I believe, have rifled barrels. That real fact: over 30,000 people died by gunshot last year, 70% + of those from handguns.

    I hunt 25+ days a year, and respect the deadly tool I use to do so. Hunting rifles, as you clearly show, work well for hunting, but ultimately don’t kill a lot of people. Handguns aren’t great for hunting animals, but sure are efficient at killing people. Reasonable restrictions on ownership and mandated training aren’t a bad idea at all. A lot of sportsmen will agree with this statement, though many are reluctant to admit it. The NRA has done a great job of eliminating any middle ground or reasonable discussion.

    As a side note, if I’m in a fist-fight with someone, I kindly ask that you don’t pull out your hidden gun. I’ll take my slim chances with death-by-fist to my considerably higher chances of death by bad aim (and bad judgement).

    • Shavri

      As long as gun grabbers continue to use as an examples those evil AR-15 as being the reason guns need to be regulated then you are barking up the wrong tree. Reasonable restrictions in Democrats minds is no one can own anything, they have said so plain and straight out. So as long as there is no middle ground for them any compromise on the part of gun owners just puts the middle ground they will be asking for next further towards their side.