Winchester Low Recoil/Low Noise AA Target Load


Trusted Review™ Scorecard

Average Score: 4.3 out of 5.0

Each product or service is rated on Quality, Reliability, Price/Value, and Referability. Each area has an individual score, and creates an overall Trusted Review™.

In addition to making a great trainer shell, the Low Noise/Low Recoil shell will be a boon to owners of vintage guns like this 1912 Fox Sterlingworth.

In addition to making a great trainer shell, the Low Noise/Low Recoil shell will be a boon to owners of vintage guns like this 1912 Fox Sterlingworth.

As a shotgun instructor, one of my biggest problems teaching women and youth is balancing recoil against the ability of a shell to break clay targets. I ruled out the .410 and 28 gauge a long time ago as training guns. The .410 has low recoil but requires precise shooting to consistently break targets. The 28 is capable of low recoil and breaking targets but costs about twice the price of 20 gauge shells.

The problem is that normal 7/8-ounce loads still deliver a bit too much recoil for really timid or small gunners. Recoil and noise reduce the number of shots a new shooter can handle in a training session and if you exceed that comfort level, you risk getting the new shooter into the nemesis of successful shotgunning: flinch.

I’ve used different trainer loads over the years, most carrying a payload of 3/4 ounces. These shells will break the target but carry about 15% less shot than a standard load, reducing the new shooter’s chance to break the target and, therefore fail to gain much needed confidence.

Winchester’s new AA Low Recoil/Low Noise shell may be the best compromise yet. Similar in recoil to a 3/4-ounce 28 gauge load, this new shell for new shooters generates, to my estimation, about a third less noise. The report sounds like an under-loaded shell yet targets break cleanly and I can’t detect appreciable changes in lead. I used them with a new shooter this week and, after the session, I allowed her to try a regular shell. She was amazed at the difference both in sound and felt recoil.

At 980 feet per second, these shells are about the same velocity as other trainers I’ve been using but the extra shot has to make a difference in scores at the end of a session. They are noticeably quieter than other trainers and that can reduce flinching problems, since noise can be as much a factor as recoil with some shooters.

A great bonus is that these shells will be great for vintage gunners who want to shoot lighter loads in old guns to keep pressures down and protect 100-year old stocks.


Winchester AAs have set the standard for target shooters since their inception in the 60s.


This shell won’t break as many targets as a regular target load, but the compromise for low recoil and noise is a viable tradeoff.


It seems a shell with less should cost less rather than more, but the issue is quantity. Smaller runs mean higher costs but quantity plays a big part in pricing. The AA Low Recoil is more expensive than the trainer shells I’ve been using, though perhaps the low noise will prove a big advantage.


I’d recommend this shell for any instructor for smaller, more timid shooters. It will break clays consistently and can help build confidence, critical with new shooters.

Image courtesy Dick Jones

Any views or opinions expressed in this article are those of the author and do not reflect those of OutdoorHub. Comments on this article reflect the sole opinions of their writers.

One thought on “Winchester Low Recoil/Low Noise AA Target Load

  1. Jethro

    I have long felt that the 28 gauge was the best starting/training gun. The above article confirms that. It also confirms the fact that high velocity in shotshells makes little difference to the target, but a big difference to the shooter. I get better patterns with low velocity near 1100fps, and yet my 12 gauge dove loads consistently drop birds out to 50 yards (measured). I wish the ammo companies would quit pricing 28 gauge and 410 bore in the punitive range and allow these guns to come back to the popularity they deserve! I believe it would attract more people to shotgun sports, which in turn would bring ammo companies even greater profit.


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>