Twice in the past two years, members and supporters of the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) have successfully united coastwide opposition to sector separation at the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council.  While literally thousands of recreational fishermen responded to calls opposing the various sector separation mechanisms proposed under a multitude of versions since 2012, the Gulf Council is again entertaining proposals pushed by Environmental Defense Fund (EDF) and its well-funded investors.

“Once again we are asking all recreational fishermen who fish the Gulf of Mexico to speak up and in staunch opposition to this treacherous scheme to tear our community apart,” said RFA executive director Jim Donofrio. “This is nothing but a ‘divide and conquer’ strategy aimed at minimizing our ability to fight back against a broken system and incomplete recreational data collection.”

In a  widely circulated email bulletin this past January, Donofrio encouraged anglers to speak out against sector separation, explaining how the federal government is using the regional council process to divide the saltwater angling community into have’s and have not’s, without any reasonable harvest data to guide their decision.  “The Commerce Department and its National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) is allowing the recreational fishing sector to be ripped apart piece by piece, without ever meeting their congressional mandate to provide better data,” he said at the time.

Earlier this week, the Gulf Council’s Red Snapper Advisory Panel voted 6 to 5 in a roll call to maintain the unity of the recreational fishing sector, supporting status quo in Amendment 40.  Based on the long history of public comment in opposition of sector separation and the advisory panel’s vote in opposition to sector separation, RFA members have a hard time understanding why the Council continues wasting time, resources and money in trying to advance such an unpopular issue.

“There’s another round of public hearings in the Gulf of Mexico starting on Monday, and anglers and business owners need to get active, this time by submitting comments in-person, directly to these managers,” Donofrio said.  “We acknowledge that there are huge problems that need to be addressed in this fishery, but most are the result of mandates contained within the Magnuson Stevens Act, and sector separation is absolutely not the answer.

“The real solution lies in the hands of our legislators,” he added.

As RFA has frequently pointed, EDF activists who would like to see individual fish tags implemented across the recreational fishing spectrum are continuing to push their agenda through the council process, despite thousands of anti-sector separation comments received by the Gulf Council and Commerce Department.

On July 24, the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation announced the award of a $100,000 grant from its Fisheries Innovation Fund (a program launched in 2010 with funding from NOAA Fisheries, the Walton Family Foundation and the Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation) towards EDF’s efforts to create a catch share program for head boats.  Details of the grant reveal “this project could lead to the implementation of first large-scale recreational catch shares management in the Gulf of Mexico.”

“The key thing to remember on this sector separation scam is this; the Gulf Council tabled sector separation after I laid on the podium, as part of the public record, copies of over 400 pages of comments against sector separation,” warned RFA member Capt. Tom Hilton of Texas in January. “By giving them 1-1/2 years to gather signatures from customers going fishing on charter boats each morning, we can expect the EDF-funded captains to come out in full force with reams of paper supporting sector separation, count on it.”

“Radical fleet reduction is the goal,” said RFA Panhandle member Capt. Chip Blackburn of Mexico Beach, FL. “First headboats, next will be charter for-hire, next will be the rest of recreational fishermen.”

“Once the recreational sector is divided, the environmental business leaders and their fish shareholders hope to move forward with their fish tag concept so that the only way anyone can fish for red snapper, grouper or sea bass is by purchasing a harvest tag for each fish you plan to take,” Donofrio said. “Just about any fisherman you meet who tells you that sector separation and intersector trading in the Gulf of Mexico probably already own shares of grouper or red snapper, and simply sees you as a future customer.”

Back in January, RFA encouraged sector separation opponents to submit comments directly to the federal government following the release of the public comment portion on Christmas Eve of 2013, in a move clearly designed to minimize response.  Members of the RFA Florida Panhandle chapter are encouraging anglers to attend the upcoming hearings in person.

Go to the link below to send comments directly NMFS.

Click here to view various comments received since Christmas morning of 2013.

Click here to view RFA’s letter to the Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council. 

The following public hearings will all begin at 6 p.m. local time. RFA is actively encouraging those able to attend to do so.

August 4, 2014
Hilton Galveston Island Hotel
5400 Seawall Boulevard
Galveston Island, TX

Sirata Beach Hotel
5300 Gulf Boulevard
St. Petersburg Beach, FL

August 5, 2014
Plantation Suites & Conference Center
1909 State Highway 361
Port Aransas, TX

August 6, 2014
Fairfield Inn & Suites by Marriott
3111 Loop Road
Orange Beach, AL

August 7, 2014
Renaissance Mobile Riverview Hotel
64 S. Water Street
Mobile, AL

August 12, 2014
Holiday Inn Select
2001 Martin Luther King Blvd.
Panama City, FL

August 18, 2014
Hyatt Place Baton Rouge
6080 Bluebonnet Blvd.
Baton Rouge, LA

August 19, 2014
Courtyard by Marriott Gulfport
1600 E. Beach Blvd.
Gulfport, MS

 

Logo courtesy Recreational Fishing Alliance

What's Your Reaction?

[reactions id="387542"]

One thought on “RFA Urges Anglers to Help Stop Red Snapper Takeover

  1. Please people if you can, go, and speak loudly. It is so typical of these “social engineers”, to ram their own foolish opinion and “feelings” down our throats. If you are successful this far, they will just keep coming back for more, when you are weary and or not paying attention. It is this administrations intention to divide and conquer not just this issue but all issues that would bite into our freedoms. This one is probably from the ‘animal rights’ czar Cass Sundsteen (sp?) himself. He’s the lawyer that thinks animals ought to be able to sue people for abuse and such. And he’ll represent them……? There is only one reason they will waste all that time and resource, especially in the face of the huge rebound the ARS, and grouper (Goliath nuisance) have made in such a short time. To me it says the problem wasn’t any where near the detriment they professed. In other words they are liars, and cheats.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *