Earlier this year, ATF rule 41F was entered into the Federal Register, which significantly changes the transfer of items regulated by the National Firearms Act (NFA) and, perhaps most importantly, several things regarding suppressors.

Rule 41F, which will take effect July 13, is determined to shake things up, but it’s not all bad news. In fact, one of the most significant changes to celebrate with the new rule is the removal of the Chief Law Enforcement Officer (CLEO) sign-off on NFA applications. Previously, applicants for NFA items (suppressors, short-barreled rifles, fully automatic firearms, etc.) were required to obtain a certification from a CLEO. This, many gun owners and advocates argued, allowed officials to arbitrarily deny Americans from owning NFA items.

Now, the new rule only mandates applicants to notify CLEO’s instead.

“For the first time in 82 years, local law enforcement will no longer have de facto veto power over any NFA applications,” said Knox Williams, President and Executive Director of the American Suppressor Association. “While their inclusion in the process made sense in 1934, before background checks, or even computers existed, the removal of this antiquated measure from the NFA process is a major victory for the suppressor and NFA communities.”

Rule 41F is not all rainbows and cherries, however; it does include several frustrating changes that could impact you. For example, the ATF itself estimates that NFA wait times could double once the rule change goes into effect. This is due mostly to the rule change around fingerprinting for trusts and corporations. Yes, two fingerprint cards, as well as a passport photo of each person listed on a trust, are going to be required going forward after July 13, 2016 each time you want to purchase a NFA item under the Trust.

You can still get around this slowdown if you buy a silencer under an NFA Trust before July 13, 2016. All pending applications submitted before the rule change will be grandfathered under current rules. So if you want to do it the easy way, I suggest you buy a $129 SilencerCo Easy Trust and begin the purchasing process now. The ATF processes thousands of suppressor orders under the SilencerCo Easy Trust monthly and, because of this, orders seem to process faster than those using larger/custom trust documents. Click here for the Easy Trust.

Are trusts no longer relevant after July 13th? No, trusts are still advantageous for a number of legal reasons even after 41F goes into effect. They include:

  • People listed on a trust can be in possession of the items listed in the trust, otherwise it’s against the law
  • May help protect against future regulatory restrictions
  • Provides clear lines of inheritance for all the items on the trust

Are you new to suppressors and not sure which one to get? Or perhaps you want a suppressor to fit all your firearms? The hottest suppressor on the market that is interchangeable from 9mm all the way up to .45-70 GOV is the SilencerCo Hybrid. You can watch it in action below or learn more here.

Image from the American Suppressor Association

What's Your Reaction?

Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry

21 thoughts on “New ATF Rule on Suppressors: Why Buy Now

  1. When I was twelve I built a quote , silencer ,unquote . I don’t remember where I got directions (fifty years ago ) ,probably the public library . Somewhere in my mind I knew it was illegal but I was twelve and silencers ,in movies always worked , and made a small pfft sound . I got one muffled shot with my .22 ,after that it got louder . As a result ,I decided the whole idea was a waste of time and another Hollywood movie myth . I wish now that silencers had been legal ,perhaps even a requirement . I could live forever without learning what tinnitus is like or making ” what did you say ? ” a regular part of conversation . It is past due ,to remove this law from the books entirely ! It belongs in the trash bin with the prohibition laws that ended up funding organised crime into the third largest American industry of the twentieth century .

    1. I agree, Snug. Our family had a cabin in the woods in the 60s and 70s, and my Dad taught us how to shot a single shot .22 rifle and shotguns. No one used hearing protection back then. My brother and I both have hearing loss and I have tinnitus. I have hearing aids at age 55 too. I think the 44 Magnum pistol I had in the 80s was the worst though. Now, I have to wear hearing protection all the time, when using a lawn mower, circular saw or any loud device. Only wish we had taken more precautions way back. A 12 gauge shotgun, for example, is extremely loud.

  2. Why a silencer,neither one of you will hear the bullet, the one who shoots, or the one shot at. Just another kids toy, useless as teats on a boar hog.

    1. Hearing protection.
      Not upsetting every “neighbor” within 2 miles.
      Not scaring every animal within 2 miles; i.e. getting a shot at another coyote…..

  3. Wish the cost would come down. With paying for threading the muzzle(if not already), a Good suppressor, and the Feds taking their hefty cut, it gets expensive. Then again, so are hearing aids.

  4. ATF is a tyrant organization. They go against all that are stated in our founding documents. Theses tyrants simply regulate for funds.

  5. Hey ! I learned a lot from the analysis ! Does anyone know where my business could grab a sample ATF 5310.12 example to complete ?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *