The National Shooting Sports Foundation today strongly objected to the last-minute reversal of the U.S. government position regarding the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. In the closing hours of negotiations on Thursday, March 28, the government abandoned its previous insistence that the treaty be approved only through achieving “consensus” of all the member states. Requiring consensus had been the United States position going back to earlier administrations.

At the end of the session, a U.S. government spokesperson told reporters “It’s important to the United States and the defense of our interests to insist on consensus. But every state in this process has always been conscious of the fact that if consensus is not reached in this process, that there are other ways to adopt this treaty, including via a vote of the General Assembly.” The spokesperson went on to say that the United States would vote “yes” on the treaty in the General Assembly, regardless of the positions of other member states. By abandoning the requirement for consensus the United States is assuring passage of the treaty by the United Nations.

“This abrupt about-face on the long-standing United States requirement for ‘consensus’ illustrates that the Obama Administration wants a sweeping U.N. arms control treaty,” said Lawrence Keane, NSSF senior vice president and general counsel. “We are troubled by the timing of the Obama Administration’s decision to abandon consensus on the eve of the Senate debate on pending gun control measures. The United Nations treaty would have a broad impact on the U.S. firearms industry and its base of consumers in the U.S.”

Industry analysts have identified three major areas of concern with the treaty text. The treaty clearly covers trade in civilian firearms, not just military arms and equipment. It will have a major impact on the importation of firearms to the United States, which is a substantial source for the consumer market. And it will impose new regulations on the “transit” of firearms, the term defined so broadly that it would cover all everything from container ships stopping at ports to individuals who are traveling internationally with a single firearm for hunting or other sporting purposes.

“We hope that the Members of the U.S. Senate are closely watching the White House abandon its principles and promises in the rush to ramrod this flawed treaty into effect. Not only will they later be asked to ratify this attack on our constitution and sovereignty, but they will also be lavished with new promises from the administration in its drive to push a broad gun control agenda through the U.S. Senate when it returns from recess. They would be right to question those promises strongly,” concluded Keane.

Image courtesy NSSF

What's Your Reaction?

Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry

3 thoughts on “NSSF Objects to U.S. Government Abandoning Position That U.N. Treaty Must Be Based on International “Consensus”

  1. more double-dealing by obama/kerry and company. at the same time he abandoning the U.S. position he’s telling us he doesn’t want to take our guns…and some people are dumb enough to believe him.

  2. UNITED STATES is a foreign corporation, under bankruptcy, and it’s receivers are the Rothschild British banks. FEDERAL RESERVE is not part of any government of any nation. The British Virginia Company morphed into UNITED STATES and set up in the District Of Columbia, unlawfully, in 1871. “14th amendment, U.S. citizens” are not the same as American Nationals. U.S. citizens are property of the corporation. Start researching on your own, because most are too stupid to learn even when they’re told and shown. U.S. citizens have civil rights, which can be given or removed. American Nationals have natural rights because they’re living, breathing souls. UNITED STATES is not a government. It’s a foreign occupation of British Accreditation Registry operatives. That’s right! BAR Association!

    You U.S. citizens are under martial law! Your president writes executive orders! You have no right to travel! You have no right to privacy. You have no one seated in government. You are property of the tax farmers.

    Research HB 638 in New Hampshire.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *