Electronic Arts (EA) is one of the largest developers and publishers in the video game industry, owning franchises such as Madden NFL, The Sims, and the popular Battlefield first person shooter series. The second largest video game maker in the United States by revenue, EA recently announced that it is dropping several gun manufacturers from its licensing and marketing collaborations. According to Reuters, links between EA websites and those of gun makers have already been dropped.

For added realism in high-budget productions such as the Call of Duty and Battlefield series, real-world weapons are often displayed at length in-game. Previously, this resulted in cordial relations between both video game developers and gun makers with both sides benefiting from the collaboration. Video games enjoyed a degree of authenticity, while firearm manufacturers received promotion in an industry that rivals Hollywood, and one that appealed to young men in the 18-29 age bracket. A casual glance at modern video games reveals that firearms are often represented in meticulous detail. Call of Duty and similar brands are especially prolific, offering a wide representation of firearms that could be considered a virtual armory. Legal permission to use brands such as Remington, Colt, Magpul, or Bushmaster was granted for a low price or entirely free.

Tension grew between video game developers and gun makers after the shooting in Newtown, Connecticut. Following the tragedy, National Rifle Association Executive Vice President Wayne LaPierre gave an address that touched on the influence of media and entertainment on gun crime, specifically singling out video games such as the Grand Theft Auto series, Bulletstorm, and Mortal Kombat as negative influences.

EA told Reuters that the decision to drop the marketing collaboration with gun makers was not a result of politics or the NRA’s stance, but rather caused by feedback from consumers. EA’s products will continue to display branded guns and the company believes they have the right to do so. That notion is being challenged by Textron Inc., who says the game developer’s use of their products was trademark infringement. The court case is now expected to take place this summer, which could set a precedent in fair use laws in video games.

Below is a look at the firearms included with Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3:

httpv://youtu.be/JuiXffk87_8

Image screenshot of video by MAR89TUM on YouTube

What's Your Reaction?

Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry

3 thoughts on “Major Video Game Developer Breaks with Gun Manufacturers

  1. Had nothing to do with politics. Yeah right! Those 18-29 year old males were complaining that the game was too authentic. How dumb does EA think we are? Remember, we did not vote for Obozo. EA may be able to fool the Obozo supporters with these lies. All political BS!

    1. Agreed Sir-
      I’m so tired of all this Sandyhook, Sandypants, bullsh&t..
      Obozo is a good one, I was calling him Barack O’hypocrite.
      I’m just tired of all this anti-gun rhetoric, they can all eat my balls!

  2. EA never made the Call if Duty franchise, they’re doing the Battlefield franchise! Apart from that mistake I don’t think EA is doing that because of Sandyhook: think about it, they’re displaying branded rifle models that teenager who know probably nothing about firearms are gonna be using and loving, it’s pure advertisement for the gun industry! Why should they pay for it! On the other hand EA is just known for being an awful money grabbing company so could be just that :/

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *