Hunters are often faced with ethical dilemmas. While hunting in Texas, one hunter made a wrong turn when faced with temptation and it cost him more than he ever imagined.

South Texas’ deer hunting is unique in that large ranches are managed for producing big whitetail bucks through carefully regulated harvests of mature deer, culling of deer, and feeding of protein and minerals. Many ranches have their own set of laws and rules regarding deer hunting that go above and beyond the laws set by the state wildlife authorities.

Jim Stinson holds one of the 10,000-acre leases on the 130,000-acre Duval County Ranch, and he subleases it to eight to nine other dedicated big buck hunters who pay $10,000 each per year for the right to hunt on the lease. They also participate in the feeding and care of the deer, which includes predator control, culling inferior bucks, and keeping the water flowing so deer have plenty to eat and drink during the area’s notoriously hot seasons.

One of the hunters who enjoyed the fantastic hunting privileges on this lease was Jim’s friend Skip Weiner of Boise, Idaho. Skip had been hunting there for nearly a decade. Bucks are allowed to reach the age of at least five or six before they are shot so they have a chance to reach their full potential. The hard work and restraint paid off well, as many dandy bucks were shot each year, and there was always the hope that one of them would blow up into a real giant.

That’s exactly what happened. A buck they knew to be only three years old had an outsized, jaw-dropping rack. It was as big as anything they had ever shot on the ranch, and it had three more years to grow.

At only four years of age, the buck named Superbuck blew up into a giant scoring 208 inches. His potential was cut off too early.
At only four years of age, the buck named Superbuck blew up into a giant scoring 208 inches. His potential was cut off too early.

There was a lot of excitement as the buck turned four. That’s the age when whitetail bucks normally take a big jump in antler size because their body mass has completed its growth and the deer can put its full energy into growing a rack. They were not disappointed. The buck was a true giant at four years old. The hunters spent considerable time analyzing videos and photos of the buck. They determined that the deer would score over 200 inches at four, and was certainly not done growing yet. Clearly this was a deer with world-class potential.

They named the buck “Superbuck” and it was on everyone’s mind all season long. The buck was quite predictable and visible, which is unusual for a giant, but then he was only four years old, still young and naïve. He was seen several times that fall in an area of the ranch where they had protein and corn feeders.

Normally the buck would be off-limits until it was six years old, but a pact was made among the hunters that the buck would be allowed to live out its natural life and spread its genes into the gene pool for as long as it lived. This was a very difficult decision, but it was subject to change if they determined that the buck would be a world record at age six. They might decide to cash in the chips.

The ranch’s management policy requires that trophy bucks are shot after the rut, so the hunters cannot kill big bucks until the end of December through the end of season the middle of January. This strict policy is heavily enforced. All bucks shot must be checked in at the ranch headquarters where they are weighed, aged, scored, and recorded. Taking a buck off the ranch without going through the check-in is illegal.

Most of the hunting was done on the weekends. In January, most all the hunters are in camp on the lease, hunting hard to kill one trophy and one cull buck (Texas allows two buck tags per season). At the end of the weekend in question, everyone packed up to head home for a work of week with plans to come back again the next weekend.

This photo was taken not long before the buck was shot and removed from the ranch and taken across state lines illegally.
This photo was taken not long before the buck was shot and removed from the ranch and taken across state lines illegally.

Except Skip Weiner, who didn’t actually leave. He went hunting.

After a few weeks, it became clear that Superbuck was missing. Spring came and the bucks were growing their antlers but Superbuck was nowhere to be found. Could he have moved to another area of the ranch? Could he have been dragged down by coyotes?

Jim had his suspicions, and he shared them with wildlife authorities. Because Jim suspected that the buck was in Idaho, the Texas Parks and Wildlife (TPW) was limited in what they could do. So Jim hired a private investigator.

The PI spent some time following up on leads, checking with taxidermists and observing behavior. He paid particular attention to Weiner who was at the top of the list of suspects if Superbuck had been illegally killed.

Weiner flew down to Texas, collected all his belongings from deer camp and drove them back to Boise, a move which Jim thought was odd since Skip had been such an avid hunter on the lease for so many years. He felt his suspicions were being confirmed.

Then the private investigator got a break. Skip’s house was listed for sale. Posing as a potential home buyer, the PI went to have a look around. Imagine the shocked look on his face when his gaze landed right above the fireplace, where Superbuck’s mount hung for all to see.

Holding Superbuck for the first time is bittersweet for Jim Stinson. He’s grateful that the buck was found but sad that it was taken illegally.
Holding Superbuck for the first time is bittersweet for Jim Stinson. He’s grateful that the buck was found but sad that it was taken illegally.

It was time to get the feds involved. There is a long list of violations involved above and beyond not tagging and checking in a deer, including a violation of the Lacey act which imposes strict penalties for taking an illegal game animal across state lines. Federal authorities have no sense of humor when it comes to this type of thing.

Armed with a search warrant, federal game wardens entered Skip Weiner’s house on Christmas Eve and confiscated the buck. The mount is now back in the hands of Texas Parks and Wildlife law enforcement while the case works its way through the court system. All parties are innocent until proven guilty, of course. The mount is expected to be a part of the TPW’s traveling poaching exhibit.

Holding Superbuck’s rack for the first time was bittersweet for Jim Stinson. Bitter because the life of a world-class buck was cut short and he was not allowed to reach his full potential, but sweet because a wrong has been righted, in a way. Jim, like all of us, hates to see poachers get away with it. The silver lining on this cloud according to Jim, is that misdeeds have consequences, and with a sense of righteous indignation, he will do whatever he can to see that the consequences are administered.

Follow Bernie’s bowhunting adventures on his blog, bowhuntingroad.com.

Images courtesy of Bernie Barringer and Texas Parks and Wildlife

What's Your Reaction?

Like
Like Love Haha Wow Sad Angry

10 thoughts on “The Tragic Saga of a Texas “Superbuck”

  1. You have to be kidding ? 9 hunters paying 10k a year to only hunt 10k acres ! And waiting 6yrs for a buck to get big enough to shoot. Did I read this right ? Super buck wasn’t that big.

    1. “Superbuck wasn’t that big.”
      I guess that’s the point. The buck scored 208 at only four year of age. Bucks here do not peak until they are six years of age. 99.9% of hunters will never see a 208 buck in their lifetime, and this one had two more years to grow.

  2. Sounds like he broke some lease rules and could be liable financially for breaking an agreement, but it doesn’t sound like he broke any state laws. Not sure if something is missing from the story, but not following lease agreements isn’t against the law. It might get you kicked off your lease, in serious situations facing a lawsuit, or destroy a friendship, but it doesn’t make you a criminal.

    1. Did you miss this paragraph?

      “It was time to get the feds involved. There is a long list of violations
      involved above and beyond not tagging and checking in a deer, including
      a violation of the Lacey act which imposes strict penalties for taking
      an illegal game animal across state lines. Federal authorities have no
      sense of humor when it comes to this type of thing.”

  3. I’m not sure what law was broken? How do they know the animal wasn’t tagged? He’s been hunting there for 10yrs so I’m sure he had his hunting license.

    Checking in your harvested deer is not required

    And the deer wasn’t poached. It was completely legal to shoot it

    It’s not against the law to break a promise to your hunting partners

    1. It is against Texas state law under MLD, which this ranch is, to fail to notify the ranch of the harvest and turn in a game harvest sheet which corresponds with the MLD tag number. He was illegal when he chose to sneak the deer out without registering and notifying the harvest. I can assure you no federal search warrant would have been granted without these facts.

      1. Ok, thanks for the info. I guess that makes sense.

        Never heard of checking in a harvested deer in Texas…. And I live in Texas.

  4. Here’s an update on the story. Weiner was fined $25,000 and lost his hunting privileges in Texas for life. Many western states are part of a pact that will not allow any nonresident hunters who have lost their hunting privileges for a game law violation, so he’s pretty much done hunting in any western state.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *